USWNT: USA vs. Canada: Topping America’s Top Hat

La Nina throwing her wait around in London…

Maura Gladys rides with the USWNT

The United States had a workman-like victory over New Zealand on Friday. Not the blowout that was expected, but, still enough to get the job done. The game was scoreless through 25 minutes, partly thanks to New Zealand’s moxie and partly thanks to the U.S., especially Alex Morgan, failing to finish off a couple sitters. But then, in what is becoming a signature play for the U.S., Alex Morgan served up a ball to Abby Wambach who slid home the first, and game-winning goal for the U.S.

Despite the lead, the U.S. failed to fully assert their dominance, leaving the door open for New Zealand to sneak back in the game. What eventually kept them out was the United States composure during the entire match.

Sydney Leroux slammed the door on the Kiwis for good with her 87th minute goal. The goal itself was Alex Morgan-esque, with Leroux using her speed to get behind the defense and slot home a nutmeg between the goalkeeper’s legs.


But the Leroux-Morgan tandem, which is still a few years from coming to fruition, will signal a stark change from the current U.S. scoring threat. Right now, Wambach and Morgan have a very cool, thunder and lightning 1-2 punch going on. Morgan and Leroux are a lightning storm, all speed and flash. But Morgan has already shown immense growth as a playmaker and visionary, which may lead her into a deeper sitting role. In the meantime, with Leroux playing the super sub role, plus Morgan and Wambach on all cylinders, the U.S. is enjoying one of the most prolific offenses in women’s soccer history.

The best part of the goal was the look on Leroux’s face after her first Olympic goal, a mix of shock, surprise, euphoria and joy.

The U.S. win sets up a semifinal match against our neighbors to the north, Canada, a pairing no one expected. It’s an incredibly intriguing matchup though. NBC is trying to hype it as a rivalry match, but in reality, it’s a rivalry only by proximity. The U.S. has historically owned Canada, holding a 7-0-1 advantage since 2009. This year alone, the U.S. thumped Canada in the CONCACAF Olympic qualifying championship match in January (both teams had qualified at this point), and downed them 2-1 in June at the United States’ send-off match. However, you get the feeling that anything could happen in this game. The U.S. could roll 3-0 and I wouldn’t be shocked, but Canada could come out strong and force a 1-1 overtime game, and I wouldn’t be surprised at all.

Canada was sneaky dangerous in their quarterfinal match up against Great Britain.

They put GB on its heels early, netting a goal in the 12th minute and doubling their lead in the 27th. Once they had the lead, they clamped down on defense, snuffing out any and all Great Britain attacks.  Canada also has a potent duo of their own in Melissa Tancredi and Christine Sinclair. Sinclair has long been Canada’s star striker, and is chasing Abby Wambach in a race to break Mia Hamm’s all-time goal-scoring record of 158. (Wambach has 142 while Sinclair has 140). But Tancredi has really stepped up, putting in the grunt work of scoring first and creating chances, taking pressure off of Sinclair and freeing her up to do what she does best, deliver in the clutch.

So, this game is kind of a mystery.  Both teams are coming in hot. Alex Morgan hasn’t scored since the first game of group play, so, she could be due for a few goals, but other than that, this chapter of the “USA-Canada rivalry” still has a lot of potential to be re-written.

4 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Jared on 2012/08/06 at 12:10 PM

    Well, the US central defense is a weakness for both men’s and women’s teams. Sinclair’s goal was way too easy. How do you let a player like that stroll into the box unmarked?


    • Posted by Eric on 2012/08/06 at 7:55 PM

      My opinion is that O’Hara was responsible for two of Sinclair’s goals. The first one, O’Hara didn’t pinch over enough on her and on the second one, she got caught ball watching rather than staying with her mark (Sinclair). Unfortunately, it shows that O’Hara is still dealing with growing pains in the transition from forward to defender.

      The US defense is much stronger with a healthy Ali Krieger and her presence is missed sorely. With her the US has the best outside back in the women’s game and only has one weak outside back instead of two.


  2. Posted by kaya on 2012/08/07 at 11:45 AM

    I hope La Nina will refrain from throwing her wait around. Luckily she seems to wait for nothing. 🙂
    I still need to go back and watch the first 2 halves as I only managed to watch the OT late last night, but Lloyd in for Boxx doesn’t seem to be helping the defensive stoutness. I saw her make 3 poor turnovers that could have been costly.
    I’m pretty amazed that Canada put the ball out when Buehler went down with cramps fwiw. They didn’t sound as gracious in the post-game comments; they probably regret it.


  3. Posted by Paul Antonissen on 2012/08/07 at 3:36 PM

    There might be a rivalry now.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: